ENDGAME Group

[Scary Snarky toaD]

I may be the only one in here who has seen the video by Alex Jones "Endgame" -- but in case anyone else has seen this and wants to discuss points "brought up" by the film with others interested, please respond. Thx.

If no one else responds, then I know I'm the ONLY OLS nutcase thinking about things like this. :joker:

[Scary Snarky toaD]

OMG, does this mean I'm the ONLY government conspiracy nut on this whole site? :dizzy:

[hppy28]

I'm planning on watching the film this weekend. I believe youtube has it in 12 parts or the whole movie is available on google video.

As far as being a conspiracy theorist ..not sure but should I put a place holder here just in case ? :laugh:

here's a trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkgGOFXuYPw

[Scary Snarky toaD]

I'm planning on watching the film this weekend. I believe youtube has it in 12 parts or the whole movie is available on google video.

As far as being a conspiracy theorist ..not sure but should I put a place holder here just in case ? :laugh:

here's a trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkgGOFXuYPw

Yeah, I've been watching the Google video, hppy. This is intense! I wish people could at least bet some exposure to this and what appears to be our "shadow government." If he didn't mention names, dates and places it could be easily laughed off as a pipe dream. But when you really look into it (and I've been reading since the early 70s about the Illuminati and New World Order) it can sure trip you out.

I'm all for laughing about this if its bunk, but what scares me the most is if it could possibly be true.

[Scary Snarky toaD]

Also want to mention that while all of ENDGAME is fascinating, I got MOST interested in everything starting at ONe hour, 20 minutes into it or so. When it got to talking about David Rockefeller's quote about China and how China regularly uses prisoners to provide organs for transplants, etc.

[hppy28]

Well, Toad, I watched almost the entire video, but it got kind of grueling toward the end. Like a lot of other conspiracy oriented material, from my perspective it suffers from some serious, if not fatal, flaws. :goofy3:

a. In many scenes, fact-based statements are presented to tell the viewer that the conclusion of the narrator is indisputable. If I don't want the government to tell me what to think, I don't want to be handed my thoughts from the other side, either.

b. There are many facts which are brushed over, such as Edward VIII's abdication- it is commonly acknowledged that his wanting to marry a divorceé was the prime factor in his abdication, not his obvious Nazi sympathies. When only a partial truth is presented, I get leery. I feel the same way about Michael Moore's films.

c. There's too much credit for brilliance needed in a conspiracy of this size by people I don't believe are that smart.

I do believe people in government and elsewhere conspire to keep us in the dark about many things. China's use of dissenter cadavers as organ sources, for example, has a great deal of credibility for me.

I also found the info on the Trans-Texas Corridor intriguing. Not sure how it would effect us nationally. Found it interesting that Ron Paul piped up on it.