PDA

View Full Version : Suit Seeks to Ban Kids From Eating Oreos


hodges1601
May 12th, 2003, 11:40pm
SAN FRANCISCO - Kids in California may have to give up their Oreos, if a lawsuit filed by a San Francisco public interest lawyer is successful.


The lawsuit, filed last week in Marin County superior court, seeks a ban on the black and white cookies, arguing the trans fats that make the filling creamy and the cookie crisp are too dangerous for children to eat.

Stephen Joseph said he filed the suit against Nabisco, the maker of Oreos, after reading articles that said the artificial fat is hidden in most packaged food, though consumers have no way of knowing.

The big difference between this suit and others that have targeted tobacco and McDonald's fast food is that consumers know that tobacco is bad for their health and that McDonald's food contains a lot of fat, Joseph said.

"Trans fat is not the same thing at all. Very few people know about it," he said, explaining that his suit focuses on the fact that trans fats are hidden dangers being marketed to children.

Nabisco officials were not immediately available for comment. They have 30 days from the May 5 filing date to respond to the suit.

The National Academy of Sciences (news - web sites)' Institute of Medicine (news - web sites), which advises the government on health policy, said last summer that this kind of fat should not be consumed at all. It is directly associated with heart disease and with LDL cholesterol, the 'bad' kind that accumulates in arteries.

But the U.S. Department of Agriculture (news - web sites) said partially hydrogenated vegetable oils, which contain trans fats, are present in about 40 percent of the food on grocery store shelves. Cookies, crackers, and microwave popcorn are the biggest carriers of trans fats, which are created when hydrogen is bubbled through oil to produce a margarine that doesn't melt at room temperature and increases the product's shelf life.

The Food and Drug Administration (news - web sites) has tried to force food companies to list trans fat content with other nutritional information on food packages, but manufacturers have challenged the rule. Even food labeled "low in cholesterol" or "low in saturated fats" may have high percentages of trans fats.

Informing customers about trans fats on food labels could prevent 7,600 to 17,100 cases of coronary heart disease and 2,500 to 5,600 deaths per year, the FDA has estimated.

Joseph said he has targeted Nabisco because, while other major snack food makers have reduced the amount of trans fats in their products, Nabisco has not.

suzannek1
May 12th, 2003, 11:53pm
I'm NOT giving up my Uh-oh Oreos winning cookies, I'm not, I'm not!!!................................................. oh yeah, I haven't won them yet :(

Well, maybe they will give away more now??

:smile3: :smile3:

smartykat
May 13th, 2003, 12:00am
Give me a break....These law suits really irritate me....:toss:
kt

Kellylynn30
May 13th, 2003, 5:11pm
give me a break.. won't people just stop with the ludicrous lawsuits. NO ONE is forcing them to put the yummy Oreo's in their mouth. Instead of suing Kraft corporation, i think that attorney should be focusing more on "helping" those who need a break in attorneys fees.. I mean if he has all this free time on his hand to pursue a frivalous lawsuit. get out there and do some pro bono work.. for the love of god...... these people need to get a life...
Just my opinion

Gomez
May 13th, 2003, 5:25pm
How do you know this is not pro bono work?

velvet49329
May 13th, 2003, 5:28pm
Who the hell does he think he is?? The only person who ever had a right to save us from ourselves was Jesus.:laugh: I laugh,but I mean it. Does he honestly believe that there are people out there that think Oreo's are good for them? Give me a break!

Kellylynn30
May 13th, 2003, 5:36pm
WHAT I meant about doing pro bono work was to go and represent someone who actually has a ligitimate need for an attorney.. NOT this crap

marilyn lux
May 13th, 2003, 5:44pm
I saw this on the news yesterday and couldn't stop laughing. I don't think iv'e ever read or seen anywhere that it was suggested that cookies were good for you. Either are potato chips or fried burritos or doughnuts.

I bet the judge will hear the case and a light bulb will come on "Wow, it never occured to me that oreos isn't a balanced meal-they must be stopped!"

Ideally, parents consider them snacks and don't generally make a habit of serving them as the main course of a meal.

itsknotsew
May 13th, 2003, 5:58pm
This is just like that idiot woman suing McDonald's cause her son weighed 400 lbs.!!! Who's stuffed all those Big Macs down his throat anyway!!! Stupid! :mad:

binski
May 13th, 2003, 6:57pm
Just reminds me of a joke:

What do you call ten lawyers parachuting?

SKEET!

(*not an attorney; just have to work for them)

mnsteph
May 13th, 2003, 7:13pm
Just another attorney with too much time on his hands...makes me SICK!
Just like the "large" folks and McDs lawsuit...my god ,if you cant drag yourself away from a burger or a stack of Oreos, I think you got issues that go way beyond " trans fats". ( and you all know I am not talking regular eating, the folks in these ridiculous lawsuits are generally 400 # teenagers...I say sue the parents before the food company, why should we all pay because someone has no self control and lets their kids get huge...)
:goofy2: