PDA

View Full Version : More on Welfare


dandylin
April 20th, 2004, 2:52pm
By Ariel Gore | 4.19.04
How to Live on $577 a Month

From the most recent In These Times

The Social Security Administration recently informed me that I’ve earned enough “credits” for my child to receive $577 per month in benefits “if you die this year.”

Five hundred and seventy-seven dollars a month. It’s funny. I used to get exactly that on welfare: a young broke single mom with her sweet fat baby. Five hundred and seventy-seven dollars. But that was a long time ago—before Newt explained to me “personal responsibility”; before my 21-year-old self was blamed for everything from economic decline to the moral decay of Western Civilization; before Clinton signed welfare reform while getting a blowjob from an intern; before Bush Jr. stole the White House; before my baby morphed into a teenager.

Five hundred and seventy-seven dollars a month. Was it enough? Of course not. But it was rent or utilities or food, take your pick. Five hundred and seventy-seven dollars a month: Now I have to die to get it.

When my middle-class friends started receiving their $400 tax credits in the mail (supposed to make them turn a blind eye to the $350 billion tax giveaway Bush Jr. handed the wealthiest Americans), I waited by my mailbox.

Mine was a working family, was it not? But, no? It seems that although I’ve been working at least 40 hours a week and earning income since I got out of school and got off welfare, I, like hundreds of thousands of low-paid military personnel, didn’t earn enough to qualify mine as a “working family.”

Why I entertained the fantasy that Bush would send me $400 I can’t explain. Maybe it’s the same naďveté that made me imagine I could treat my daughter to a public school education and not expect military recruiters to meet her at the door when she entered middle school. Naďveté because, alas, buried deep in the No Child Left Behind Act—W’s education law passed in 2001—is a provision requiring all public secondary schools to provide military recruiters with access to facilities and contact information for students.

So at the tender age of 11, despite my specific protests, my girl-child came home from school with a U.S. Navy Frisbee and an attitude that said, “Mom, you just don’t understand what these nice people want to do for kids.”

These nice people and their $577 a month.

If I didn’t know better, I could listen to their rhetoric and imagine that the transfer of resources in this country was from rich to poor rather than the other way around. We nanny their children. We pay their mortgages with our rent checks. We till their fields. And when they offer us $577 a month, they act as if they are giving us a gift. When we demand it, they say we suffer from “a sense of entitlement.”

“You haven’t really worked,” they say.

So, if not working, what exactly have I been doing these past 33 years to earn Social Security “credits”?

Besides having a 14-year-old daughter I have to protect from Uncle Sam and the Supreme Court on a daily basis—a girl-child who grew up on welfare and food stamps but who nonetheless is apparently healthy enough to fight for a government that never fought for her—I teach high school. Yep. I work with the folks Education Secretary Rod Paige referred to as “a terrorist organization.” And you thought you’d have to do more than instruct kids on the art of metaphor to be labeled an enemy combatant.

Apparently, Rod was kidding.

Not kidding was the baby-faced student who walked into my senior creative writing workshop a day later and announced that he couldn’t wait to get home and tell his mama that she wouldn’t have to pay his college tuition after all.

“How’s that?” I piped up, imagining that this gifted student had gotten a full scholarship from the Rotary Club or the United Negro College Fund.

“I’ve joined the Army! My mom’s been working her butt off all her life for me, but now I’m taking responsibility for my own education!”

My baby-faced student—one of just a handful I thought understood the concept of “metaphor.”

“Why you trippin’?” he stammered as my face fell.

The following week, he showed up with a crew cut. And he never wrote me another metaphor.

It’s almost enough to make you start rooting for the draft. At least then the children of the corporate criminals who are profiting from this war might have to go, too.

But when I turn on my television, who’s the corporate criminal preparing to go to prison? It’s the single mom and housewife extraordinaire—Martha Stewart—who will pay for a thousand illegal stock trades, a thousand atrocious sweatshops. The mother. The housewife. The woman so uppity as to think she was entitled to more than $577 a month.

Ariel Gore is the editor-publisher of Hip Mama and the author of four books including Whatever, Mom: Hip Mama’s Guide to Raising a Teenager. Go to www.whatevermom.com

dandylin
April 20th, 2004, 2:56pm
I'm not really sure why I posted this, it's actually a hodge-podge of information. I especially wanted to point out paragraph 6. Thanks for reading it! :)

NHGrits
April 20th, 2004, 3:27pm
Dandylin,
I was on welfare too, and in the military. I didn't get a $400 check but I got earned income credit or darn near all my taxes back. Did you pay taxes, bet any back, or claim earn income credit. I hate when people say they didn't get the credit back, yet they didn't pay taxes either. I don't see how you could have made less than $30,000 with children and not got all your taxes back or earned income credit. My daughter, also on welfare, doens't get money back, cause she doesn't file taxes unless she works, and when she got married she and her husband an 3 kids got over $2000 back, more than they paid in. I don't think everyone realizes this happens. My husband and I now make good money, all but two kids are gone, and I got back $800 last year for my kids on the tax credit. Paid tons in. Have to pay in this year. So you have to make money to get money back.

dandylin
April 20th, 2004, 3:34pm
If you actually read the article you would see that the person that wrote it works. Is actually a teacher.

Txsweeper
April 20th, 2004, 3:35pm
If I didn’t know better, I could listen to their rhetoric and imagine that the transfer of resources in this country was from rich to poor rather than the other way around. We nanny their children. We pay their mortgages with our rent checks. We till their fields. And when they offer us $577 a month, they act as if they are giving us a gift. When we demand it, they say we suffer from “a sense of entitlement.”

“You haven’t really worked,” they say.

So, if not working, what exactly have I been doing these past 33 years to earn Social Security “credits”?

Hmm, that's odd. I have been working since I was 19, which is 25 years. I do not have a college degree and all jobs I have held have been under $40K per year except for 2001 and 2002. Yet my paperwork, which I received in Jan of this year says that my child (if I had one) would receive $1013.00 per month should I die.

Either her math is off or she's pullin' someone's leg.

dandylin
April 20th, 2004, 3:40pm
That would all depend on how old you are, when you graduated from college, and what happened in-between.

Veuve-Cliquot
April 20th, 2004, 4:08pm
I didn't really understand that at all. She's a teacher, but she's in the military? She hates rich people, but she likes Martha Stewart? She has to die to get her $577? How will she use it then?

I appreciate that Ms. Gore is angry, and I'm sure she has every right to be. But I think she could do a better job of getting her point across.

cowleyh
April 20th, 2004, 4:37pm
Dandylin,
I was on welfare too, and in the military. I didn't get a $400 check but I got earned income credit or darn near all my taxes back. Did you pay taxes, bet any back, or claim earn income credit. I hate when people say they didn't get the credit back, yet they didn't pay taxes either. I don't see how you could have made less than $30,000 with children and not got all your taxes back or earned income credit. My daughter, also on welfare, doens't get money back, cause she doesn't file taxes unless she works, and when she got married she and her husband an 3 kids got over $2000 back, more than they paid in. I don't think everyone realizes this happens. My husband and I now make good money, all but two kids are gone, and I got back $800 last year for my kids on the tax credit. Paid tons in. Have to pay in this year. So you have to make money to get money back.

I love you. :laugh:

Txsweeper
April 20th, 2004, 4:45pm
Because I'm skeptical of her claims that after working for 33 years (her words) her child is only eligible for $577 per month if she should die, I called my sister.

My sister cares for her granddaughter. My niece died last year, 5 days short of her 24th birthday. She was a single mother of two. Her income over a 5 year period amounted to less than $25,000, she was on welfare since her first child was born with the exception of a few low income jobs, pizza parlors, day cares, etc.

Currently my sister receives $469.00 per month.

BTW, I don't think she was saying she was in the military, I think she is trying to say that "like" low income military personnel.....

She just appears to be an angry person, and maybe she has a right to be, I don't know.

c1986goose
April 20th, 2004, 4:46pm
For once V-C, I agree with you. Semper Fi! Goose

dandylin
April 20th, 2004, 5:05pm
I didn't really understand that at all. She's a teacher, but she's in the military? She hates rich people, but she likes Martha Stewart? She has to die to get her $577? How will she use it then?

I appreciate that Ms. Gore is angry, and I'm sure she has every right to be. But I think she could do a better job of getting her point across.

She didn't say had to die to get her $577, she said that if she died this year her daughter would get $577 a month.

She didn't state she was in the military, she was using a simile.
Definition: Simile
Simile
Noun

1. A figure of speech that expresses a resemblance between things of different kinds (usually formed with `like' or `as').

She was stating that Martha Stewart, a single mom, is paying the price that many other's should be sharing with her. She was pointing out the prejudice that instigated the whole thing.

I realize this was a rant of an angry woman, but we all get to a point where we've had enough and I thought she made some incredibly valid points.

superchickee
April 20th, 2004, 5:28pm
Sounds like she's a raving weird woman. Makes no sense/ does not add up. Sorry.

Veuve-Cliquot
April 20th, 2004, 6:20pm
She didn't say had to die to get her $577, she said that if she died this year her daughter would get $577 a month.



Actually she did. She said:

Five hundred and seventy-seven dollars a month: Now I have to die to get it.

I realize that was not what she meant, but I had to read the piece four times to get there. I understand that she's angry, but her incoherent writing style didn't do her any favors in communicating her anger, at least to me.

I still don't understand how Martha Stewart fits into her rant, it seems out of left field, and brings up a new point (sexism) that she hadn't really brought up before. But whatever. I'll stop picking on her writing, and talk about the content.

I did find the information in paragraph 6 interesting, but I don't share her rage about it. We live in a country without mandatory conscription, unlike many others. There has been a long history of the military going into schools to try and recruit students. But they're not forcing the kids to join up -- they still have a choice in the matter. They might misrepresent the military to them, making it seem more glamorous than it really is, but honestly, all advertising does that, and if the kids haven't figured that out by the time they're 17, they probably could use a stint in the Army.

dandylin
April 20th, 2004, 6:21pm
All I can ask for is input. I sure did get some! :laugh: Can't win 'em all. But I still think that while she comes off a bit incoherent, that she has some valid points to make.

Veuve-Cliquot
April 20th, 2004, 7:01pm
All I can ask for is input. I sure did get some! :laugh: Can't win 'em all. But I still think that while she comes off a bit incoherent, that she has some valid points to make.

No biggy, Dandy. Not judging your taste here.

As you have deduced, I didn't care for Ms. Gore's rant at all. I just read it again(!), and I think what bothers me the most is her misplaced sense of entitlement. Her whole "we till the fields" rant was a bit much, IMO. I doubt she's ever tilled a field.

She was a single, welfare mother, and for her, it appears that the system worked. She was able to go to school, and she's now a teacher. While I agree with her that the whole $400 Bush tax refund was stupid in the extreme, I don't see how she feels entitled to a refund. She already withdrew from the system, and now she wants more. I'm glad that she was helped by the welfare system, but to feel wronged because she didn't get a tax refund on taxes she didn't pay seems to me, well, wrong.

Good grief, my "inner Republican" is coming out. I HATE when that happens.

donkeydoings
April 20th, 2004, 7:22pm
...She was a single, welfare mother, and for her, it appears that the system worked. She was able to go to school, and she's now a teacher. While I agree with her that the whole $400 Bush tax refund was stupid in the extreme, I don't see how she feels entitled to a refund. She already withdrew from the system, and now she wants more. I'm glad that she was helped by the welfare system, but to feel wronged because she didn't get a tax refund on taxes she didn't pay seems to me, well, wrong....

Exactly.

dandylin
April 21st, 2004, 8:20am
I don't personally think that there should be a "limit" to how much you draw from the "system" be it SS benefits, Medicare, or tax refunds. Do we now feel it's ok to penalize people indefinitely for having had to use the system? Doesn't that help in creating what I've heard called the "Welfare Habit" an attitude perpetuated when no matter how hard one works, or how they straighten out their lives and become productive citizens, that they are going to get kicked in the head?

NHGrits
April 21st, 2004, 8:37am
dandylin,
To continue to give some one more money to keep them down and on welfare is not the answer. As I stated before, with both myself and my daughter, both single mothers on welfare at one time, training/education is the answer. There should be a program in place to educate those on welfare, who then in turn can get a job supporting themselves and their families. My daughter and I are examples of this, as well as others. If you continue to just increase welfare payments offering no plan to make a person a productive individual, then you make the welfare system a way of life. I am NOT talking about any individuals who cannot work do to health, injury or disability.

dandylin
April 21st, 2004, 10:18am
dandylin,
To continue to give some one more money to keep them down and on welfare is not the answer. As I stated before, with both myself and my daughter, both single mothers on welfare at one time, training/education is the answer. There should be a program in place to educate those on welfare, who then in turn can get a job supporting themselves and their families. My daughter and I are examples of this, as well as others. If you continue to just increase welfare payments offering no plan to make a person a productive individual, then you make the welfare system a way of life. I am NOT talking about any individuals who cannot work do to health, injury or disability.

I am referring to tax credit, not welfare. and if she is working as a teacher, she should get the tax credit.

oldroses
April 21st, 2004, 12:24pm
Dandylin, I liked your post, it made perfect sense to me. But then, I march to a different drummer on these boards, of that I'm certain.

I think the point she was making about unfair inequaties was quite valid:

*$577 when she's DEAD-but she was put down for taking $577 to LIVE.
*Working as a teacher, but not getting the $400 refund-though the rich got that and then some.
*Student who signs up for college via the military-because his parents can't afford to pay for it.
*Martha Stewart a successful woman, prosecuted to the nth degree-meanwhile men in same or similiar situations get a slap on the wrist.

This country may be free, but there are far too many things that aren't equal or fair to all.

:twocents:

dandylin
April 21st, 2004, 12:55pm
Thank you, your words mean a great deal.