MrDave
April 14th, 2004, 1:20pm
Censorship or common sense?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In last night's speech by the Pres:
Q Thank you, Mr. President. Mr. President, April is turning into the deadliest month in Iraq since the fall of Baghdad, and some people are comparing Iraq to Vietnam and talking about a quagmire. Polls show that support for your policy is declining and that fewer than half Americans now support it. What does that say to you and how do you answer the Vietnam comparison?
THE PRESIDENT: I think the analogy is false. I also happen to think that analogy sends the wrong message to our troops, and sends the wrong message to the enemy.
This administration has repeatedly warned the American public/media to basically "watch what they are saying" and has implied that statements that are critical of some of their war policies are unpatriotic.
I can see why they don't want to give terrorists or enemy fighters any moral boost, but in a democratic country is this type of warning appropriate?
I, for one, find this type of comment very distasteful and dismissive. However I totally agree with Bush that we cannot lose Iraq now that we have invaded. I also think we cannot give in to terrorism because giving in in the past is what set up the success and the continued fight of the terrorists. But my bottom line is that in a democracy there has to be debate and openness of information for it to work correctly, so I am offended by this type of comment coming from the President.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In last night's speech by the Pres:
Q Thank you, Mr. President. Mr. President, April is turning into the deadliest month in Iraq since the fall of Baghdad, and some people are comparing Iraq to Vietnam and talking about a quagmire. Polls show that support for your policy is declining and that fewer than half Americans now support it. What does that say to you and how do you answer the Vietnam comparison?
THE PRESIDENT: I think the analogy is false. I also happen to think that analogy sends the wrong message to our troops, and sends the wrong message to the enemy.
This administration has repeatedly warned the American public/media to basically "watch what they are saying" and has implied that statements that are critical of some of their war policies are unpatriotic.
I can see why they don't want to give terrorists or enemy fighters any moral boost, but in a democratic country is this type of warning appropriate?
I, for one, find this type of comment very distasteful and dismissive. However I totally agree with Bush that we cannot lose Iraq now that we have invaded. I also think we cannot give in to terrorism because giving in in the past is what set up the success and the continued fight of the terrorists. But my bottom line is that in a democracy there has to be debate and openness of information for it to work correctly, so I am offended by this type of comment coming from the President.